Comparison of Online Accessibility Evaluation Tools: An Analysis of Tool Effectiveness

The use of online tools is a common practice for evaluating the accessibility of a website, identifying problems, and providing useful feedback on how to fix detected issues. For ease of accessibility validation, many tools have been developed and implemented successfully over the years. Yet, the results of these tools show differences in terms of coverage, correctness, and reporting-related issues. In this study, we compared online accessibility evaluation tools to understand to what extent they differ in detecting accessibility problems in websites. A total of 41 government websites of different countries were tested for violations of accessibility guidelines using six evaluation tools. We observed that each tool generated different evaluation data for the same websites. As some of the tools are complementary to each other, meaning the highest coverage and completeness can be possible with the right combination of evaluation tools. Therefore, we suggest different tools should be utilized to provide consistency and obtain reliable data from online evaluation tools, thereby improving tool effectiveness.

Views
76
08.07.2022 since the date of
Downloaded
1
08.07.2022 since the date of
Last Access Date
28 Mayıs 2024 11:38
Google Check
Click
Full text
Detailed View
Publication Name
(dc.title)
Comparison of Online Accessibility Evaluation Tools: An Analysis of Tool Effectiveness
Author/s
(dc.contributor.yazarlar)
Rita Ismailova, Yavuz Inal
Publication type
(dc.type)
Makale
Language
(dc.language)
İngilizce
Publication year
(dc.date.issued)
2022
National/International
(dc.identifier.ulusaluluslararasi)
Uluslararası
Source
(dc.relation.journal)
IEEE Access
Volume/Issue
(dc.identifier.volume)
10
Page
(dc.identifier.startpage)
58233-58239
ISSN/ISBN
(dc.identifier.issn)
ISSN: 2169-3536
Publisher
(dc.publisher)
IEEE Xplore Digital Librar, USA
Databases
(dc.contributor.veritaban)
Web of Science Core Collection
Databases
(dc.contributor.veritaban)
IEEE Xplore
Databases
(dc.contributor.veritaban)
Scopus
Index Type
(dc.identifier.index)
SCI Expanded
Index Type
(dc.identifier.index)
Scopus
Impact Factor
(dc.identifier.etkifaktoru)
3,476 / 2021-WOS / 5 Year: 3,758
Abstract
(dc.description.abstract)
The use of online tools is a common practice for evaluating the accessibility of a website, identifying problems, and providing useful feedback on how to fix detected issues. For ease of accessibility validation, many tools have been developed and implemented successfully over the years. Yet, the results of these tools show differences in terms of coverage, correctness, and reporting-related issues. In this study, we compared online accessibility evaluation tools to understand to what extent they differ in detecting accessibility problems in websites. A total of 41 government websites of different countries were tested for violations of accessibility guidelines using six evaluation tools. We observed that each tool generated different evaluation data for the same websites. As some of the tools are complementary to each other, meaning the highest coverage and completeness can be possible with the right combination of evaluation tools. Therefore, we suggest different tools should be utilized to provide consistency and obtain reliable data from online evaluation tools, thereby improving tool effectiveness.
URL
(dc.rights)
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9785837
DOI
(dc.identifier.doi)
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3179375
Faculty / Institute
(dc.identifier.fakulte)
Mühendislik Fakültesi
Department
(dc.identifier.bolum)
Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü
Author(s) in the Institution
(dc.contributor.author)
Rita İSMAİLOVA
Kayıt No
(dc.identifier.kayitno)
BL054A6BCE
Record Add Date
(dc.date.available)
2022-07-08
Notes (Publication year)
(dc.identifier.notyayinyili)
2022
Wos No
(dc.identifier.wos)
WOS:000808032600001
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
government
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
guidelines
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
web pages
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
licenses
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
W3C
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
visualization
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
object recognition
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
automated evaluation
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
government websites
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
online evaluation tools
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
WCAG
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
web accessibility
Subject Headings
(dc.subject)
web performance
Analyzes
Publication View
Publication View
Accessed countries
Accessed cities
Our obligations and policy regarding cookies are subject to the TR Law on the Protection of Personal Data No. 6698.
OK

creativecommons
Bu site altında yer alan tüm kaynaklar Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.
Platforms